Frost & Sullivan’s Innovations in New Product Development eBulletin
 CONNECT


BLAST FROM THE PAST

Mission Not Impossible!
Define Your CI Unit Position

  By Alessandro Comai
University of Pompeu
Fabra, Spain


Actionable competitive intelligence supplies the key intelligence and information that provides knowledge about the external environment and improves the quality of senior managers’ decisions. Creating a valuable competitive intelligence function that meets the various needs of internal clients requires its developer to consider the multiple facets of competitive intelligence. Leveraging resources, identifying key intelligence priorities, exploiting information sources, creating a culture of gathering and sharing information, building ethical processes and applying information technology all play key roles in any competitive intelligence function.

The organization of competitive intelligence programs differ among firms. In fact, each program reflects the various factors that make it unique. For instance, the company’s degree of its globalization, age, size and culture all influence the development and the resources it invests in CI. But all competitive intelligence programs have similar choices in common:

       • Do they produce marketing or technology intelligence?
       • Is the unit positioned at the corporate or department level?
       • How are external and internal sources exploited?
       • Is the company using any future-oriented models when analyzing the    
         environment?

Knowing the answers to these questions makes it possible to understand which aspects are more suitable for a specific organization.

In addition, all good competitive intelligence programs have mission statements that are developed and implemented based on the individual culture and needs of the specific organization. Mission statements help ensure that the competitive intelligence function meets the requirements of all its internal clients. These statements drive a strategy for advancing the competitive intelligence function. This article describes a framework for constructing an effective mission statement based on six key dimensions.

MISSION STATEMENT BASICS

Mission statements represent a clearly defined evolutionary strategy for how to develop and advance the competitive intelligence function in an organization (Comai 2005). Several individuals have developed definitions for the concept of competitive intelligence mission statements. For example, Simon wrote:

 

The mission is a statement of business and purpose—the fundamental reason for the unit's existence. It is the specific duties or services that a unit imposes on itself, often reflecting the core values of managers in an organization (1997, p91).

 

Pollard also saw the importance of a mission statement. “The benefit of competitor intelligence can only be maximized with the right competitor intelligence strategy, which might be summarized in a mission statement.” It should include “what intelligence should be produced and for whom, from what sources, and what process” (Pollard, 1999, p 30).

 

There is a fundamental difference between vision and mission. For De Wit and Meyer,

 

[t]he mission outlines the fundamental principles guiding strategic choices; a strategic vision outlines the desired future at which the company hopes to arrive. In other words, vision provides a business aim, while mission provides business principles (2004, p593).

 

Understanding and applying both concepts helps guide an individual competitive intelligence function to a world-class level.

 

MISSION STATEMENT MODEL

 

Competitive intelligence mission statements should be developed according to the needs of the individual organization. For example, MetLife believes the competitive intelligence function should “provide the right information, to the right people, at the right time, to make the right decision” (APQC, 1999, p 80).

 

The model discussed in this article presents a general overview of the potential of competitive intelligence as well as the “meta objectives” that an organization may adopt to guide the function. McKenney said, “Clearly stating your objectives is key for any successful implementation” (2005, p12).

 

A mission statement defines the aims of the competitive intelligence function and its future achievements. It also represents a guideline for allocating resources and capabilities. To develop an effective mission statement, create a steering committee and involve senior managers in the project at an early stage. According to Trim:

 

In order that an effective Corporate Intelligence Unit is established it is essential that senior management defines what it is and what it involves (2001, p91).

 

THE SIX DIMENSIONS

 

An effective competitive intelligence mission statement incorporates elements that answer the following four key questions:

 

       • What is driving our ideas?

       • Why does the competitive intelligence function exist?
       • What is the fundamental importance of the function?
       • Where does the function operate?

 

Under this perspective, thinking strategically about who and what the competitive intelligence function serves leads to an effective mission statement that can be formed around six dimensions:

       1. Process. Is the CI function systematic, an ad hoc–based project, or a
           mix between the two?

       2. Type. How is the CI function managed in the organization?

       3. Scope. At which level of the organization is the CI function’s focus        
          
located?

       4. Location. Which department is involved in CI?

       5. Time span. How future-oriented is the CI function?

       6. Object. What kind of key actors does the organization follow?

 

SIMILARITIES AND DIFFERENCES

 

These six dimensions show several options for defining a competitive intelligence function, and a myriad possible CI configurations. They also point to significant differences in the way an organization can structure and operate its competitive intelligence operations.

 

Despite these differences, there are similarities in some dimensions across industries. For instance, pharmaceutical companies typically spend significant resources on technical intelligence, while and aerospace companies tend to be strategic and oriented toward up-front intelligence. A study conducted by ions tend to have some common objectives that are independent to the industry.

 

An organization can effectively define where to invest the resources to develop its competitive intelligence function if it knows the differences and similarities between the various ways to focus its competitive intelligence function. It also assists in defining CI priorities within the company and the different dimensions that can be developed during that time.

 

Based on the six dimensions, the mission statement crystallizes the option that an organization has chosen for its competitive intelligence function. It allows the organization to not only communicate the focus for the current situation, but also determine the future of the CI function.

 

APPLYING THE SIX DIMENSIONS

 

When starting or revamping a competitive intelligence function, involved parties should consider these six dimensions and how they apply to their particular environment. Constructing the function around these dimensions will help to define the most effective competitive intelligence function within the organization.

 

Considering the six dimensions will also provide a framework for developing an effective competitive intelligence mission statement. Establishing and following a mission statement ensures that the CI function meets the needs of internal clients and provides actionable intelligence to the organization’s decision-making process.

Click for references


Bookmark and Share    


Competitive Strategy Workshop
Sept. 15, 2010
San Jose, CA


Latin American Summit
Oct. 5-7, 2010
Sao Paulo, Brazil

Asia Pacific Summit
Oct. 20, 2010
Singapore

European CI Summit
Nov. 16-18, 2010
Barcelona, Spain

SCIP 2011
International Annual Conference & Exhibition

May 9-13, 2011
Orlando, FL


more
smartorg



 
July 29, 2010
Creating the Roadmap to
World Class CI programs
Wisconsin Chapter
September 16, 2010
Scenario Building
SCIP Italia
Starting and Managing
a CI Function
Sept. 28-29, 2010
Alexandria, Virginia
We Want Your Input
Call for Papers
Subscribe Me
Subscribe a Friend
To Advertise
COMPETITIVE INTELLIGENCE MAGAZINE
Highlights from past issues
of SCIP’s quarterly publication:
Stacking the Strategy Deck with
CIKM (Rothberg)
Defining Strategic – You and What Army? (Wheaton)
Benchmarking for insight on R&D Productivity (Matteo)
Frost and Sullivan
 
Join SCIP
SCIP Blog
SCIP LinkedIn Group
CI News
Job Board
Event Calendar
Webinar Archives
SCIP Bookstore
Board of Directors
SCIP Chapters
 
Frost and Sullivan
 
  The Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals merged with the non-profit Frost & Sullivan Institute in 2009. The partnership between Frost & Sullivan Institute and SCIP provides a powerful opportunity to enhance the benefits SCIP offers its members.  
 
 

PRIVACY POLICY: We are committed to protecting your right to privacy. © 2010 Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals. This message was sent to you by Society of Competitive Intelligence Professionals, 1700 Diagonal Road, Ste. 600, Alexandria, VA 22314. If you would prefer not to receive further messages from this sender, please reply to this email and place the word REMOVE in the subject line.